This web page was produced as an assignment for an undergraduate course at Davidson College.
Assignment #2: Summary of Schwarzer et al., 2016
"Lactobacillus
plantarum strain maintains growth of infant mice during chronic
undernutrition"
(All figures are from Schwarzer et al., 2016)
Schwarzer
et
al. (2016) characterized
the effect of gut microbiota
on juvenile mouse growth during both normal breeding and depleted diets.
The
researchers used wild-type and germ-free mice experiments and measured
juvenile
weight, body length, and femur length as markers of infant growth. For
both
diet types, wild-type mice with intact microbiota displayed more
juvenile growth
than germ-free mice. Additionally, the researchers examined the growth
effects
of two specific strains of Lactobacillus
plantarum, LpWJL
and LpNIZO2877, and
found that
only monocolonized LpWJL
mice grew like wild-type mice under both diet conditions. The
researchers
attributed the growth benefits of the gut microbiota to increased
somatotropic
axis activity, and demonstrated this by finding increased expression
level of
major somatotropic axis genes in both wild-type and LpWJL mice compared to germ-free mice, even on depleted
diets. Therefore, gut microbiota and LpWJL
alone promotes juvenile growth even during chronic malnutrition through
increasing the activity of the somatotropic axis. These findings
highlight the
importance of intact gut microbiota on infant growth, especially in
cases of
chronic malnutrition.
I think this is a
well-written, thorough, and logical paper. The researchers’ hypotheses
and
experimental questions are easy to understand and follow as a reader. I
believe
that the researchers provide ample evidence to demonstrate that the gut
microbiota promotes juvenile growth through enhancing the somatotropic
axis,
and this effect persists even during a depleted diet. However, I did not
think
a few figure panels were necessary. For instance, I believe it was a
waste of
“real estate” to include Figure 1F, because they only include this
phenotype
measurement once, and Figure 3B, because Figure 3C provides the same and
more
information. The authors addressed numerous interesting and important
supplementary figures, and could have included them in this article if
they did
not use some of the redundant figure panels. Additionally, it would
strengthen
the researchers’ argument to include statistical analysis for Figure 3A
and 3C
to discriminate between the very small differences that they claim are
substantial, such as the body lengths of mice on the breeding diet.
To determine the
effect of
gut microbiota on infant mice health, the researchers analyzed the
weight, body
length, and femur bones of wild-type and germ-free juvenile mice fed a
normal
breeding diet. Germ-free mice significantly weighed less (A), gained
less
weight per day (B), had shorter bodies (C), and grew in length less per
day (D)
than wild-type mice with intact gut microbiota. Additionally, germ-free
mice
had shorter femur bones (E) with reduced cortical thickness (F).
Therefore,
even in infant mice fed a normal breeding diet, gut microbiota promote
juvenile
growth.
The somatotropic axis
is
known to drive postnatal growth through the pituitary gland secreting
GH, GH
increasing expression of IGF-1, and IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 binding to
stimulate
somatic growth. Therefore, the researchers hypothesized that the gut
microbiota
promotes somatotropic activity to support infant growth. They measured
the
three main somatotropic genes’ protein levels in the serum (A-C) and
mRNA
expression in the liver (D, E) of wild-type and germ-free mice fed a
normal
breeding diet. Gene mRNA expression was normalized to Tbp (TATA box binding protein) to control for expression activity
differences. Germ-free mice had significantly less IGF-1 and IGFBP-3
mRNA
expression and protein levels at least 28 days after birth. Finally,
they
measured phosphorylation of a specific AKT, which is a marker for IGF-1
binding
to its receptor, and found that germ-free mice had significantly less
AKT
phosphorylation. In all, this figure supports their hypothesis that the
gut
microbiota supports infant growth through increasing the activity of the
somatotropic axis, specifically by increasing IGF-1 and IGFBP-3
expression and
IGF-1 binding to its receptor.
The researchers
addressed
three questions in this figure: (1) does the gut microbiota promote
juvenile
growth during chronic malnutrition, (2) does the bacterium Lactobacillus plantarum specifically protect juvenile growth, and
(3) is L. plantarum’s
protective
effects strain specific? The researchers chose to investigate L.
plantarum (LpWJL and LpNIZO2877)
because they previously determined that the bacterium promotes
growth in Drosphilia. The
researchers analyzed
wild-type, germ-free, monocolonized LpWJL,
and monocolonized LpNIZO2877
mice on either breeding or depleted diets. They obtained monoclonized
infant mice
by exposing germ-free adults to the respective bacterial strain for 20
days and
then mating the monocolonized adults. The researchers measured infant
mouse weight,
body length, and femur length. Wild-type and LpWJL mice had increased growth in all growth categories
compared to germ-free and LpNIZO2877
mice within diet categories. All mice fed the breeding diets had more
growth
than those with depleted diets. The differences in infant growth are not
apparent until after weaning, because infants are then reliant on solid
food.
Ultimately, this figure demonstrates that the gut microbiota is
protective
during a depleted diet and LpWJL
is more protective than LpNIZO2877,
so the growth effect of Lp in
mice is
strain specific.
Figure 4 A-C compares
the
protein levels of the three main somatotropic genes in the serum of
wild-type,
germ-free, LpWJL, and
LpNIZO2877 mice
fed the
depleted diet after weaning. The protein levels in LpWJL mice mostly matched those in wild-type levels,
which were both significantly greater than those in germ-free mice, and
the
protein levels in LpNIZO2877
and germ-free mice were similar. Thus, wild-type and LpWJL mice promote the somatotropic axis even during
malnutrition. Additionally, LpWJL
alone is nearly sufficient to rescue promotion of the somatotropic
axis and
therefore juvenile growth, whereas LpNIZO2877
has no effect on somatotropic activity. To further confirm that the
somatotropic
axis directly influences juvenile growth, the researchers treated
wild-type
mice with PPP, a specific inhibitor of the IGF-1 receptor, for 10 days
(D-G).
They found that PPP-injected mice have significantly less overall growth
than
the vehicle control (DMSO) mice when the mice are on a breeding diet,
and that
PPP-injected mice have significantly smaller femurs than the control on
a
depleted diet. These results support that the gut microbiota upregulates
the
somatotropic axis even during chronic undernutrition and that the
somatotropic
axis directly promotes juvenile mouse growth.
Genomics
Home Page
Biology Home Page
Hannah
Itell Genomics Homepage
Email Questions or Comments to: haitell@davidson.edu
© Copyright 2016 Department of Biology, Davidson College, Davidson, NC 28035