This web page was produced as an assignment for an undergraduate course at Davidson College.
Assignment #2
Review: Lactobacillus plantarum strain maintains growth of infant mice during chronic undernutrition
Summary
Opinion
Overall, I thought this paper is
easy to follow and relatively
compelling based on the results presented. This experiment
demonstrates another
important function of gut microbes, which have been studied by
many to be
essential in maintaining life on earth. The paper has a logical
flow: I understand
why each experiment was conducted and each experiment addresses
a specific
question that explains the effect of microbiota in juvenile
growth. The data
clearly shows the relationship between gut microbiota and the
somatotropic axis
and how they affect postnatal systemic growth in infant mice.
Most importantly,
this paper has great implication for public health because
malnutrition still
affects many children in developing countries, and malnutrition
is not always
remedied by improvement in nutrition. This study provides
insights into how the
introduction of gut microbiota can potentially mediate some of
the pathology. Therefore, I
would like to see what species of microbiota are in the WT mice
since they
outperformed the two Lactobacillus strains monocolonized mice in
growth as measured by both body weight and length.
However, there can be improvements
in data visualization in this paper. I found the order of the
figures in this
paper rather confusing. For example, figure 4 was referenced in
the paper
before figure 3 so it might be easier for the readers to follow
if they rearrange
the order. Also, while panel A to C in Figure 4 addresses how the
somatotropic
axis activity was reduced in GF mice during chronic
undernutrition,
panel D to G discusses that the
somatotropic axis is required for juvenile growth; the two are
not closely
related, so it might be better to have them as two separate
figures. Furthermore,
in Figure 4 panel A, they switch the position of GF and WT as
opposed to Figure
1 where WT is on the left and GF is on the right; it will be
nicer if they can be consistent
throughout the paper.
Figures
(All figures below courtesy of Schwarzer et. al., 2016)
Figure 1
Gut microbiota helps juvenile growth in mice, as measured in both weight and body length. Both WT and GF infant male mice were fed a standard diet and both weight and body length of GF mice increased at a slower rate over time than WT mice (Figure 1A and 1C). Moreover, WT mice have significantly higher weight and body height than GF mice even when they consumed similar amounts of food relative to body weight (Figure 1B and 1D). Bone growth parameters such as femur length, cortical thickness, and cortical bone fraction were also measured using caliper and a high-resolution nanotom device. Both photograph of representative femur bones (Figure 1E) and three-dimensional reconstructions of representative distal parts of femur bones (Figure 1F) at day 56 show reduction of growth in GF animals. In conclusion, gut microbiota sustains postnatal somatic tissue growth.
Figure 2
Gut
microbiota helps juvenile growth through systemic somatotropic axis
activity. By using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit,
circulating levels of GH, IGF-1, and IGFBP-3, major components of the
axis, were measured. Both WT and GF mice have similar levels of GH over
time, with GH levels peaking around birth and gradually declining (Figure
2A).
IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 are both significantly higher in WT mice (Figure 2B
and 2C). Igf1 and Igfbp3 expressions
in liver, measured by quantitative RT-PCR, also showed significance
decrease in GF mice (figure 2D and 2E). The group further studied
phosphorylation of Akt at Ser 473, a marker of IGF-1 receptor signaling
activity, and three western blot results showed that phosphorylation
event was significantly reduced in the liver of GF animals at day 28
after birth (Figure 2F).
Figure 3
Gut microbiota helps maintain juvenile growth under the condition of chronicundernutrition. After feeding WT mice, GF mice and mice with Lactobacillus plantarum strain, either LpWJL or LpNIZO2877, with either a standard diet or a nutritionally depleted diet, the group compared body weights and body lengths and determined that they all lost weight and reduced longitudinal growth; nonetheless, GF mice suffered a greater reduction in both body weights and body lengths (Figure 3A, 3B, 3C, and 3D). Furthermore, LpWJL has a greater potential than LpNIZO2877 in rescuing the somatotropic axis activity, showing strain-dependent promotion of juvenile growth. In summary, specific Lactobacillus strains can help reduce the negative effects of stunting during chronic undernourishment.
Figure 4
Gut
microbiota promotes juvenile growth through systemic somatotropic
axis activity during chronic undernutrition. GH, IGF-1, and
IGFBP-3 levels were
measured using
ELISA kit at day 28 and day 56. Even though GH levels peaked in GF
mice at day28, there is no significant difference in GH levels at
day 56 (Figure 4A). WT mice have
the highest concentrations of both IGF-1 and IGFBP-3, followed by
LpWJL
then LpNIZO2877 (Figure 4B). In summary, the
somatotropic
axis activity was reduced in GF mice under the condition of
chronic undernutrition. The group also injected WT mice with the
noncompetitive
inhibitor of IGF-1R, PPP, and observed that both body weight and
body length reduced significantly when compared to WT mice treated
with DMSO (control) when they
were fed the standard diet; femur length decreased significantly
with both the standard diet and the nutritionally depleted diet
(Figure 4D, 4E, 4F and 4G). Thus,
the result demonstrates that the somatotropic axis activity is
required for postnatal systemic growth.
References
Schwarzer M, Makki K, Storelli G, Machuca-Gayet I, Srutkova D, Hermanova P, Martino ME, Balmand S, Hudcovic T, Heddi A, Rieusset J, Kozakova H, Vidal H, Leulier F. 2016. Lactobacillus plantarum strain maintains growth of infant mice during chronic undernutrition. Science [Internet]. [cited 17 Jan 2016]; 351(6275):854-857. Available from: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/351/6275/854.long
Genomics
Page
Biology Home Page
Email Questions or Comments: shli@davidson.edu
© Copyright 2016 Department of Biology, Davidson College, Davidson, NC 28035