Review of: "A Transmembrane Segment Determines the Steady-state Localization of an Ion-transporting Adenosine Triphosphatase"
This paperís goal is to identify
in the H, K- adenosine triphosphatase of gastric parietal cells motifs
responsible for localization in the apical membrane domain. The researchers
use a functional approach involving the creation of chimeric proteins and
ultimately implicate the fourth transmembrane domain of the H,K- ATPase
as being sufficient but not necessary for apical membrane localization.
The researchers derive their
chimeras from the coding sequences of H,K- ATPase and Na,K- ATPase.
H,K- ATPase is normally directed to the apical domain while the Na,K- ATPase
is directed towards the basolateral membrane domain. Both proteins
are P-type ATPases that have a catalytic alpha subunit which crosses the
membrane ten times as well as a beta subunit consisting of a single transmembrane
domain which must complex with an alpha subunit in order for both to exit
the ER. In addition, the beta subunit is believed to regulate the
cycling of the H,K- ATPase complex between the apical domain and sub-apical
compartments. Because chimeras are transfected into the pig kidney
epithelial cell line LLC-PK1 which does not contain a sub-apical compartment,
the researchers are able to focus solely on apical versus basolateral localization.
Previous research had demonstrated
that the first 519 amino acids of H,K- ATPase were able to induce apical
localization when paired with the carboxy terminus half of Na,K- ATPase.
A set of seven chimeras were transfected via the mammalian expression vector
pCB6 into LLC-PK1 cells and chimeric localization assayed by immunofluoresence.
Figure 1 depicts the results of immunofluoresence for chimeras I, II and
III. Chimera I consisted of only the first 85 amino acids of gastric
H,K- ATPase fused to a segment corresponding to the remainder of a complete
P-type ATPase as determined by homology. Chimera I localized in the
basolateral membrane as it displayed the same pattern of localization as
endogenous Na,K- ATPase. The Na,K- ATPase was visualized with an
antibody recognizing an epitope spanning amino acids 1 through 21.
The chimera was also visualized with an antibody detecting an amino terminus
epitope between amino acids 3 and 23 of H,K- ATPase. The researchers
harnessed the inability of amino acids 1 through 85 of H,K- ATPase to confer
apical distribution by tagging all subsequent chimeras with this sequence.
This addition permitted visualization specifically of the chimera yet presumably
did not affect localization. The first 324 amino acids of H,K- ATPase
(Chimera II) were also unable to direct a chimera to the apical domain.
However, chimera III, containing amino acids 324-519, produced an apical
staining pattern in contrast to the basolateral staining pattern produced
in the same cell lines when stained for endogenous Na,K- ATPase.
Figure 2 depicts localization
results for four more chimeras. Chimeras IV and V subdivide the H,K-
ATPase chimeric region from chimera III into amino acids 356-519 and 324-356
respectively. Chimera IV displays basolateral distribution while
chimera V shows apical distribution as seen by immunofluoresence results
achieved in the same manner as figure 1. The H,K- ATPase region of
chimera V constitutes the second ectodomain and the fourth transmembrane
domain of the alpha subunit. Chimeras VI and VII further define this
region defined by chimera V. Chimera VI contains only the second
ectodomain and localizes basolaterally. Chimera VII contains only
the fourth transmembrane domain but it shows clearly distinguishable apical
distribution in comparison to endogenous Na,K- ATPase. The researchers
conclude that the fourth transmembrane domain is sufficient for apical
localization of a H,K- ATPase/ Na,K- ATPase chimeric protein in polar,
LLC-PK1 epithelial cells.
As it had been previously demonstrated
that complexation with the beta subunit is necessary for ER export, the
investigators were interested in establishing the identity of the beta
subunit which colocalized with their chimeras. Figure 3 depicts immunofluoresence
results from LLC-PK1 cells transfected with chimera IV and stained with
both the antibody which recognizes the chimeras as well as an antibody
specific to the Na,K- ATPase beta subunit. Chimera IV, as expected,
exhibited an apical distribution. The beta subunit was present at
both the basolateral and apical membrane domains for the transfected cell
line. This result supported the investigatorsí prediction that the
endogenous beta subunit would colocalize with chimera IV since it contained
the carboxyl terminus half of Na,K- ATPase which had been shown to specify
interaction with the beta subunit. In addition, expression of H,K-
ATPase beta subunit in LLC-PK1 cells had never been detected.
A final chimera was constructed
to see if other portions of the gastric H,K- ATPase might also induce apical
distribution. A chimera containing the second ectodomain and part
of the second cytoplasmic loop but lacking the fourth transmembrane domain
of H,K- ATPase exhibited apical distribution in contrast to endogenous
Na,K- ATPase as illustrated by the immunofluoresence results shown in Figure
6. From this result, the investigators draw the conclusion that H,K-
ATPaseís fourth transmembrane domain is sufficient but not necessary for
apical localization in these chimeras.
Only eight of the twenty eight
amino acids which form the fourth transmembrane domain differ between the
apically and basolaterally directed ATPases. Seven of these non-conserved
positions were positioned at the outer leaflet of the apical membrane domain.
The outer leaflet is known to be rich in glycosphingolipids (GSLs).
Loss of GSL polarity was known to result in failure of the Na,K- ATPase
delivery system to distinguish between apical and basolateral domains.
As the outer leaflet of the apical membrane was rich in GSLs and the positioning
of glycophosphatidylinositol (GPI)-linked proteins had been traced to this
aspect of membrane polarity, the investigators tested to see if a chimera
containing the first 519 amino acids of H,K- ATPase was, like GPI-linked
proteins, insoluble in Triton X-100. As shown in figure 5a, the chimera
H519n as well as endogenous Na,K- ATPase were detected in insoluble fractions
of the sucrose gradient used to assay their detergent solubility while
activity of GPI-linked alkaline phosphatase was detected in soluble fractions.
Figure 5b affirms, via a western blot of loaded fractions, that both endogenous
and chimeric proteins resided in Triton X-100 insoluble fractions.
This result failed to support the researcherís hypothesis that H,K-ATPase
localization resulted from partitioning within GSL-rich domains.
The final set of results in
this report examines the enzymatic properties of the chimeras. The
rat Na,K- ATPase used in the construction of the chimeras has a four-fold
lower affinity than the endogenous protein for ouabain which inhibits the
activity of Na,K- ATPase. Cells expressing chimeras I-VII were exposed
to a concentration of ouabain which is lethal to untransfected LLC-PK1
cells. Every basolaterally distributed chimera and one apically distributed
chimera, VIII, conferred ouabain resistance demonstrating that basolateral
localization was not necessary for Na, K pump activity as shown in Figure
7a. In addition, apical distribution did not inhibit all enzymatic
function. Figure 7b illustrates an enzymatic assay showing that the
apical domains of cells transfected with chimera III were able to acidify
their extracellular environment while basolateral domains, untransfected
LLC-PK1 cells, or any inhibited with ouabain were unable to lower pH.
The content of this report is
generally convincing. The investigators use established, well controlled
methods and draw conservative conclusions from the results. The main
conclusion that the fourth transmembrane domain of H,K- ATPase is sufficient
but not necessary to induce apical localization of a H,K- ATPase/ Na,K-
ATPase chimera is convincing to the point that one is hard pressed to raise
any serious objections. The chimeric proteins differ from endogenous
proteins in well-defined respects and immunofluoresence is conducted in
a consistent manner with a basolateral marker, endogenous Na,K- ATPase,
included in every panel. However, certain aspects of the report invite
criticism. The investigators should have demonstrated that rat Na,K-
ATPase, from which they derived the chimeras, localizes basolaterally since
it differs in sequence from the endogenous version. Considering that
chimera VIII demonstrates that a non-contiguous region could be sufficient
for apical localization, the inclusion of the eighty-five amino acid epitope
tag should be acknowledged in every claim of sufficiency.
The investigators admit that
the detergent solubility assay might not remain informative when applied
to multipass transmembrane proteins such as the P-type ATPases. The
failure of both the chimera and endogenous proteins to appear in detergent
soluble fractions does not rule out protein/ lipid interactions.
Furthermore, the justification of this assay is questionable. The
prediction that the chimera or endogenous protein would be detergent soluble
is based on the assumption that the ways in which GPI-linked proteins and
P-type ATPases interact with GSLs are similar. If GSL-rich domains
are responsible for the localization of chimera 519n or any other P type
ATPase, then protein transmembrane domain/ lipid interactions are expected
to be responsible. By contrast, GPI-linked protein localization in
GSL-rich domains has been proposed to result from lipid/ lipid interactions.
The research presented in this
report addresses the existence of an apical sorting signal present in H,K-
ATPase but absent in Na,K- ATPase. However, as noted in the discussion,
the possibility remains that apical distribution represents the default
pathway for P-type ATPases and that chimeras containing either the fourth
transmembrane domain of H,K- ATPase or adjoining fragments disrupt the
function of a basolateral signal. Future research might attempt to
identify such a signal using a similar, chimeric approach. However,
the H,K- ATPase and Na,K- ATPase used in the construction of the chimeras
both participate in the functional relationship being examined. A
negative of chimera VII in which the fourth transmembrane of H,K- ATPase
is replaced by that of Na,K- ATPase would consequently still produce ambiguous
results which would conclusively demonstrate neither gain nor loss of function.
A chimera in which the first 519 amino acids of H,K- ATPase or a subset
of this fragment are fused to a generally directed plasma membrane protein
in such a way so that the multipass configuration of the putative signal
is not disturbed would validate the existence of the signal if it exhibited
apical localization. However, if the apical signal resulted from
interactions between the putative signal and other parts of the alpha subunit,
then the neutral portion of the chimera would not likely induce apical
distribution.
Chimeras IV and VII differ only
by the source of their second ectodomain. Chimera VIII contains the
H,K- ATPase ectodomain while chimera IV contains that of Na,K- ATPase yet
this segment differs at only two residues between the two source proteins.
By using PCR-based, site-directed mutagenesis to create substitutions in
the chimeric ORFs in order induce a change to the alternate identity for
only one residue at a time, one could identify whether a single change
in one and/or the other amino acid is sufficient for apical localization
or whether a change in both amino acids is required.
A broader direction for future
research might involve investigating a possible role of exclusion rather
than retention signals in the maintenance of compartmental diversity for
the golgi apparatus. Specific retention signals are known to be responsible
for the localization of golgi proteins in a single compartment. However,
a retention signal necessitates the existence of a receptor protein which
itself must cycle between the location where it retrieves its target from
and the location to which it returns its target. The investigation
of a signal which inhibits inclusion in certain membrane domains or within
certain vesicles might lead to a better understanding of these processes.
Dunbar, Lisa A., Paul Aronson,
Michael J. Caplan. 2000. A Transmembrane Segment Determines
the Steady-state Localization of an Ion-transporting Adenosine Triphosphatase.
J. Cell Biol. 148:769-778.
Return to Fitz's Molecular Biology Homepage
Please send questions or comments to: fisturgill@davidson.edu