Results


Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1)

BLAST

When the five IDH1 sequences were run through BLAST, most of the matches generated were with IDH1 genes in other organisms and these were most similar to the input sequences. Some of the other matches were with isopropylmalate dehydrogenases and tartrate dehydrogenases, known to be evolutionarily related to IDH. The last significant category of matches consisted of other types of IDH, mitochondrial NADP+ dependent and NAD dependent forms. All these matches aligned with the complete IDH input sequences, which meant that there was no way to narrow the match down to specific parts of the input sequences.

Each input sequence had some unique hits which did not belong to any of the above classes, but there was no other common class of hits.

ScanPROSITE

When the "Exclude patterns with a high probability of occurrence" box was checked, ScanPROSITE found only one pattern in the IDH1 sequences -- the isocitrate and isopropylmalate dehydrogenases signature. The pattern was found in the latter third of the protein, e.g. amino acids 303-322 in the E. coli sequence.

When the "Exclude patterns with a high probability of occurrence" box was not checked, there were 7 matching patterns for each input IDH sequence. All were short (< 8 amino acids) except for the one found in the first run.

PHI-BLAST

Using the isocitrate and isopropylmalate dehydrogenase signature pattern, I ran a PHI-BLAST search with the different IDH sequences. The results were as expected -- the matches were all members of the isocitrate and isopropylmalate dehydrogenase family of enzymes -- and included different IDH genes, isopropylmalate dehydrogenases and some tartrate dehydrogenases.

PSI-BLAST

The first iteration of PSI-BLAST returned the same hits as BLAST did. Choosing any one class of matches -- isopropylmalate dehydrogenases (and tartrate dehydrogenases), mitochondrial NADP+ dependent IDH and mitochondrial NAD+ dependent IDH -- for the next iteration simply generated more matches of the same class, along with the usual list of spurious matches. The search results using each class of enzymes for the next iteration overlapped considerably as well. Once again, the same problem was encountered as in the BLAST results; the alignments were almost always whole-protein, making it impossible to narrow down a consensus sequence to any one part of the input protein sequences.

DAB

The results of running DAB with each of the input sequences are linked in Table 1.

Organism DAB output
Escherichia coli e1l20o10
Arabidopsis thaliana a1l20o10
Saccharomyces cerevisiae y1l20o10
Mus musculus m1l20o10
Homo sapiens h1l20o10
Consensus sequence c1l20o10
Table 1. Results of DAB with each IDH input sequence.

The important matches for each sequence are summarized below.

E. coli

A. thaliana

S. cerevisiae

M. musculus

H. sapiens

Consensus

Chime

The results obtained with the above tools were summarized in interactive web presentations using Chime scripting. The first presentation shows the IDH1 protein from E. coli, complexed with Mg2+ and isocitrate. The second presentation shows the same molecule complexed with its NADP cofactor and Ca2+.


Caspase 3

BLAST

BLASTing the two caspase 3 sequences yielded matches mostly with other caspases. The highest scoring matches were with caspase 3 genes from other organisms. Caspases 7 and 6 scored highly as well, in that order. The rest of the matches were with several different caspases, including caspase 2, caspase 1 and caspase 8. The alignments of the matches, especially in the lower similarity hits tended to be in the region after the first 40 amino acids.

ScanPROSITE

With the "Exclude patterns with a high probability of occurrence" box checked, there were two main patterns detected: a histidine active site and a cysteine active site. The positions of these pattern matches were at amino acids 108-122 and 154-165 respectively, for both the human and the mouse caspase 3 sequences.

As for IDH, unchecking the "Exclude patterns with a high probability of occurrence" box yielded more pattern matches. There were nine matches including the two active site matches found in the first search. Once again, all matches other than those found in the first search were short (< 7 amino acids long).

PHI-BLAST

Using the two active site patterns found in the ScanPROSITE search, I ran PHI-BLAST with the two caspase 3 sequences. The results were similar to the BLAST results and caspase 3 (from other organisms), caspase 7 and caspase 6 featured prominently. The alignments were similar to the BLAST results as well, with most of the matches aligning after the first 40 amino acids of the input caspase 3 sequences.

PSI-BLAST

Since the first iteration of BLAST yielded no surprises, running PSI-BLAST was not very useful. Using any one caspase for the iteration generated more matches for that caspase type, e.g. when I chose all the caspase 6 matches for my iteration, the results were similar to running BLAST on a caspase 6 sequence. The alignments were identical with BLAST.

DAB

The results of running DAB with each of the caspase 3 sequences are linked in Table 2 below:

Organism DAB output
Xenopus laevis x3l20o10
Gallus gallus g3l20o10
Rattus norvegicus r3l20o10
Mus musculus m3l20o10
Homo sapiens h3l20o10
Consensus sequence c3l20o10
Table 2. Results of DAB with each caspase 3 input sequence.

The important matches for each sequence are summarized below.

Xenopus laevis

Gallus gallus

Rattus norvegicus

Mus musculus

Homo sapiens

Consensus

Chime

The results obtained with the above tools were summarized in an interactive web presentation using Chime.

Back to Table of Contents

Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Please e-mail rakarnik@davidson.edu.
Copyright 2000 Rahul Karnik.